The case had been scheduled to go to trial next week. The dispute began in 1992 when Hornell Brewing Co. of Brooklyn, N.Y., bottled "The Original Crazy Horse Malt Liquor." Sales began in March 1992.

Crazy Horse Malt Liquor was distributed in 32 states and manufactured at seven breweries, said Christina Kirk-Kazhe of San Francisco, a lawyer for the estate.

In 1999, Stroh sold its brewery business but retained the Crazy Horse lawsuit. With no revenues and no malt liquor being produced, company executives began talking about how to settle the issue.

With seven horses, 32 blankets, some tobacco and sweet grass -- and an apology -- a company has settled a lawsuit brought by American Indians over the marketing of Crazy Horse Malt Liquor. The ...

In 1992 back when Congress could occasionally agree on something there was bipartisan anger over a beverage called Crazy Horse Malt Liquor because it insulted the memory of a Native American chief ...

In 1992, the family sued a New York brewery that was selling The Original Crazy Horse Malt Liquor. The company agreed to stop using the name and pay family members compensation, White Woman said.

There are still a lot of misconceptions amount malt liquor, like the myth that it's just beer without hops. This is the real difference between these two styles of brewing, and they they have both ...

In 1992, back when Congress could occasionally agree on something, there was bipartisan anger over a beverage called Crazy Horse Malt Liquor because it insulted the memory of a Native American ...