The environmental groups is being sued over anti-pipeline protests nearly a decade ago. What’s decided here could have wide ranging impacts on protest in the US.
12d
ICT News on MSNWitness: Most tribal nations at Dakota Access Pipeline protest ‘didn’t know who Greenpeace was’Nick Tilsen’s deposition was the latest testimony heard by the nine-person jury in the marathon trial between pipeline ...
A closely watched civil trial that began in North Dakota last week could bankrupt Greenpeace and chill environmental activism ...
Native poet speaks the language of Standing Rock — and explains how a presidential ... who have journeyed to the North Dakota prairie to protest the energy project. A spokesman said it was ...
16h
ICT News on MSNFormer Greenpeace leader disputes allegations by Dakota Access Pipeline developerEnergy Transfer has taken Greenpeace to trial over claims that the environmental group incited illegal acts by protesters in ...
Cox attributed between $265 million and $340 million in damages to Greenpeace. He said the jury should not only hold ...
MANDAN, N.D. -- Closing arguments are scheduled to begin on Monday in a pipeline company's lawsuit against Greenpeace, a case ...
Greenpeace is committed to nonviolence, and only got involved at Standing Rock because of tribal outreach ... system to go ...
The storied group has a remarkable history of daring protests and high-profile blunders. It faces a reckoning in North Dakota ...
5don MSN
A former Greenpeace employee who trained demonstrators during the Dakota Access Pipeline protests told jurors Tuesday that he ...
A Lakota organizer said in a video deposition played to jurors that the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe led the protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, not Greenpeace.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results