Thus, the Supreme Court has, in clear terms, held that existence of sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time is a condition precedent for exercising discretionary power to condone the delay.
(v) Courts are empowered to exercise discretion to condone the delay if sufficient cause had been explained, but that exercise of power is discretionary in nature and may not be exercised even if ...
There are cases where clean acquittal is granted by the criminal courts to the Accused after very long incarceration as an under trial. When we say clean acquittal, we are excluding the cases where ...
28. Next, in order to impeach the oral evidence of P.W. 3, P.W. 4 and P.W. 5, the Appellants asserted that there is no testimony of any independent witness, despite the place of crime as per the case ...
26. Also, it is beyond any cavil of doubt that the burden to show that in fact a failure of justice has been occasioned is on the Accused. The decision in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Paras Nath Singh ...
23. In paragraph 17 of the decision of this Court in Chandra Pratap Singh v. State of M.P. MANU/SC/1100/2023 : 2023:INSC:887 : (2023) 10 SCC 181, while dealing with conversion of charge from Section ...
Muhammad Rasheed Vs. State of Kerala Decided On: 13.08.2024, the High Court of Kerala has provided crucial clarification on the interpretation of 'organized crime' under the newly enacted Bharatiya ...
This application for grant of leave to file appeal has been filed by complainant-Vikram Manshani against the judgment dated 12.02.2024 passed in Criminal Case No.3108/2016, where- ...
a Circular dated 23rd August 2024 has been issued for scrupulous compliance of the provisions of Section 193 (3) (ii) & (iii) of the BNSS. The said Circular is taken on record. 6. In view of the ...
The Magistrate while taking cognizance of an offence should have with him the statement on oath of the complainant and if any witnesses are present, their statements. The taking of cognizance under ...
Shivkumar Dige, J.:— This Appeal is preferred by Appellant-Insurance Company against the judgment and order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’ for short), Pune.