Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...
On Wednesday, a nine-person jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer and its ...
A jury in North Dakota has ordered Greenpeace to pay more than $660 million for its role in protests against the ...
A North Dakota jury has ordered Greenpeace to pay more than $660 million in connection with protests against the Dakota ...
How SLAPP lawsuits like the one by Energy Transfer against Greenpeace for protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline will impact climate action.
Greenpeace has been ordered to pay the operator of the Dakota Access Pipeline ... Lawyers for Energy Transfer accused Greenpeace of creating a scheme to delay the pipeline’s construction with ...
Concluding that the nonprofit group Greenpeace initiated defamation, trespassing and other illegal actions by protestors opposed to the Dakota Access Pipeline, a North Dakota jury has awarded more ...
Energy Transfer first sued Greenpeace in 2017, accusing the group of racketeering and defamation with the goal of blocking the Dakota Access Pipeline. The company argued that the group's actions ...
Greenpeace must pay $660 million to Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners and subsidiary Dakota Access LLC for inciting illegal activities during anti-pipeline protests nearly a decade ago.
A jury on Wednesday ordered environmental campaign group Greenpeace to pay more than $660 million in damages to Texas-based Energy Transfer.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results