The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.

Wetlands and ephemeral streams provide a wide variety of benefits to people and wildlife, from flood protection for local ...

The Clean Water Act’s ambiguous definition of "waters of the United States" led to a restrictive U.S. Supreme Court ...

A Supreme Court ruling placed limits on federal protections for many streams and wetlands. A bill in California’s Legislature ...

The United States Supreme Court has issued a significant ruling in the case of San Francisco v. EPA, directing the ...

The Trump administration on Wednesday announced it will reconsider the reach of the nation’s bedrock clean water law and ...

The real legacy of the case, scholars say, is not its protection of former presidents from prosecution but its expansive ...

Justices Thomas and Gorsuch previously questioned the Times v. Sullivan precedent, but they didn't do so on Monday.

Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued an extraordinary cavalcade of pollution rule rollbacks on Wednesday, led ...

After a U.S. Supreme Court decision narrowing wetland protections, the EPA says it will revamp rules many farmers have long opposed.

The Trump administration moves follow a campaign promise to encourage energy production and scrap regulations enacted to slow ...