Greenpeace is clearly seen as a threat to oil and gas interests and is a target for increasingly common efforts to silence opposition.
Greenpeace testified that it played only a minor, supporting role in the protests against the pipeline, which it pointed out was led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. Tribal chairwoman Janet Alkire ...
The environmental group is clearly seen as a threat to oil and gas interests and is a high-profile target for increasingly common efforts to silence opposition.
International Rivers denounces the SLAPP ruling against Greenpeace and all attempts to silence those who speak out against ...
Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...
A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...
On March 19, three entities from the global environmental nonprofit Greenpeace were found liable for $667 million in damages ...
A federal court said it could not act on the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s complaint while a federal agency completes an ...
A federal judge dismissed the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s lawsuit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, finding that the ...
A federal judge has dismissed a legal effort to shut down the Dakota Access Pipeline in the latest lawsuit over the pipeline that originates in North Dakota's oilfields.
In a landmark decision, a North Dakota jury has ordered Greenpeace to pay over $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind ...
A U.S. District judge Friday dismissed a lawsuit by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to shut down the Dakota Access pipeline ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback